Pistol Sighting Options: If I Only had $200 to spend

A discussion in a facebook group recently got me thinking. One of my friends whom I always like talking shop with was asking about night sights for the Beretta PX4 that I’ve had for several months. I explained that I purchased some Trijicon HD sights for it, but upon inspection, noticed they were about the same dimension as the factory sights (no precision improvement), and the bright orange front sight insert looked about the same as the hobby paint home-job I had done myself. I returned the sights and saved $150. I didn’t see the incremental increase in utility from 3 tritium vials for $150. Granted, not all factory sights are as good as the ones on the PX4 (looking at you Glock), but I think the usual “YOU MUST HAVE TRITIUM ON A DEFENSIVE GUN” mantra might need to be reevaluated. Or at least considered on a case by case basis.

We then talked about lasers for the PX4, which started getting my wheels turning about choosing between fancy sights, or fancy lasers.

To further make me question my stance on tritium, one of my mentors, Paul Sharp, uses narrow fiber optic sights on his duty gun. So do several other of my meat-eating door-kicking buddies. This flies in the face of common advice. “The fiber will break and you won’t have a front sight”. Well, almost no one I know uses their gear more than Paul, and if they work for him… who am I to dismiss his findings? Besides, if the fiber falls out, you still have the steel cage it sits in, so you’re not totally S.O.L. AND FO sight sets also are less expensive at $50-75 depending on maker.

So I asked myself this question:

After nearly 10 years of taking self-defense and shooting very seriously and about 500 hours of training and countless hours of practice, if I only had $200ish to spend on a sighting system for a pistol, would I choose Tritium night sights, or a (used) laser module?

I’ve been thinking about it. My conclusion is that hands down I’d choose a laser.

T.U.G.

Why Not Tritium?

  • If you only have enough light to be able to use your tritium, then you don’t have enough light to identify your target. This can be very bad. What then follows is that you must have enough light to identify your target. If you do have enough light to identify your target, then your tritium becomes less critical because you can see the outline of your sights. All pistols should have a source of white light near them. Whether it’s carried in a pocket, in a nightstand, or mounted to an accessory rail. Just don’t use the rail mounted light to ID targets, only for shooting. Greg Ellifritz talks about WML issues here. 
qtnznw0
This is you in no-light and with tritium sights.
  • In dusk/transitional lighting, even if your fiber optic front sight (or bright paint) isn’t clearly visible, you still have the silhouette of the sights to be able to make hits. So tritium isn’t the only solution here.
  • For me, the most useful part of the tritium sights I’ve had experience with has been the large white/orange/yellow plastic that generally surrounds the tritium itself. Once again, this can be replicated on factory sights for pennies.
  • One definite plus is that in pure darkness, the little glowing tritium vials allow you to visually acquire the pistol from the nightstand. I, however, have a 3 year old, and this isn’t an option for me, so it’s not that helpful.

Why A Laser?

  • They don’t punish you for being threat focused in an adrenalized state. If you lack the discipline/training to bring your focus to the front sight during a shooting, seeing the red spot on the target area allows rapid shooting.
  • Awkward shooting positions are made easier.
  • Increased hit chance in transitional light areas (0ver iron sights) where the target is otherwise confirmed as a shoot.
  • Allow those with poor eye-sight a way to make precision hits.
  • Retention shooting accuracy improves (from a compressed ready, or a “2”)
  • Less dedicated shooters require less practice to be able to make good hits, assuming their trigger control issues are sorted out. I’ve seen this with several shooters who had trouble with iron sights for whatever reason, but rapidly improved when a laser module was introduced to the mix. Since my wife might have to use my gun to shoot someone off of me in a home invasion type scenario, I’d like to give her the best possible chance of not shooting me in the process.
  • As Claude explained to me, the way to use the laser is not to hunt for the laser on the target, but rather to present the gun in a normal fashion and use whatever you happen to pick up first, sights or laser dot.
  • Downsides: Batteries. Yeah, but hopefully the stigma of needing batteries for sighting systems has gone down since everyone has a red dot on their rifle now. Set a google calendar reminder and change them every 6 months. Besides, if the laser fails, you still have your iron sights. Practicing with the laser off, simulating battery failure, is also important.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_QQbX9jW4Y]

 

Closing

I know I’m not the first person to say lasers are worth your time. I was just posting the hypothetical about making the resource constrained decision between tritium and a laser. Next time I have access to a range and I can shoot at dusk/dark, I’m going to take a selection of pistols with different sighting setups (irons, fiber optic, tritium, and lasers) and on a timer record multiple repetitions of shooting from various ready positions, and with shooters of various skill levels. I’m pretty confident the numbers will show I’m on the right track. I’ll report back.

7 thoughts on “Pistol Sighting Options: If I Only had $200 to spend”

  1. Just being curious here as I live in a non hand gun country which is making it harder to research things for a book I am writing which involves firearms

    But don’t laugh too much if this is a dumb question but if its too dark to use tritium or identify a target then would I be right in assuming the laser dot wouldn’t help as you still wouldn’t know what exactly the dot was on and should still not shoot?

    Meaning it doesn’t extend your workable light level in a downward direction but just makes hitting a target you can see easier?

    My second question really just comes from imagining the other perspective, that of the criminal

    But surely to some extent a laser when visible also helps the BG to figure out where you are standing which a tritium sight wouldn’t. Giving them perhaps a greater chance of shooting you first especially if their eyes are already accustomed to the dark and yours are still adjusting. It might also remove some aspect of surprise as you would now have a visible line highlighting your presence which otherwise might have gone unnoticed until you were ready to take your first shot?

    1. Hi Mike,
      Thanks for your questions, I’ll do my best.
      1) You’re correct. The laser doesn’t help illuminate your target, so if you haven’t identified it with enough white light, you’re still unable to shoot. The laser really shines (pun intended), in those twilight/transitional lighting times when you can still see hands and faces, but would have trouble picking up the small notch and post sights on your gun. It absolutely ONLY makes getting your muzzle oriented on your aiming spot an easier proposition.
      2) Again, absolutely right. The laser diode is illuminated when it’s on. The same is true of a flashlight. They work in both directions. In Force On Force classes (vs human roleplayers_), you will see lots of hits to the hands and to flashlights mounted on guns. People focus on the threat and what they can see. The thing to consider is that the financially driven criminal actor has a play book that he’s following, and that he’s expecting you to follow. He approaches, shows you his gun, you get weak in the knees and do whatever he wants, he leaves, repeat. The time frames that these concealed carry shootings occur within generally don’t allow time for your gun to be glowing or not. What DOES matter is how quickly the good guy can start putting holes into the bad guy to make him stop his actions. It’s not a special ops movie where the bad guys will see your laser activate and will empty their barracks and come find you. No. The bad guy(s) know where you are, they have the jump on you, and you have to pick your timing decision and overwhelm them with violent accurate fire. Does that make sense? I know it rambled a bit. I hope this helps. feel free to ask anything else you might want to know.

  2. I have extensive night fighting experience, from two tours with the 3rdMarDiv in Vietnam. 67/68/69. Many of the authors points are well taken. Yes I am a bona fide old fart with poor vision/trifocals. Still compete in handgun competitions, although not very competitive anymore. Started competing in 1958 in the NRA JR program.

    The need for a separate white light is absolute for a LEO or a civilian. In Vietnam using a white light would quickly add pages to your health record book, or end it.

    I only use fiber optics for competition Guns. If I choose to run with out a tritium based night sight I run a gold dot. I’m presently all in with Trijicon HD’s, XS dots are god too. I have used lasers on my ‘j’ frames (3), and the green laser is vastly superior to the red, and lights up the night better than red too. Still need that white light.

    I have several guns set up for home defense, a Kimber Warrior with the SureFire x400 with DG switch, and a Beretta Vertec 92 G, with a SureFire X200 B and DG switch. Still need one of the two SureFires on the night stand too.

    In my area most agencies are running weapon mounted lights. Not to practical for me personally so I use the trig HD’s and a hand held SureFire whitelight for CCW/EDC. My “J” frames are mostly backup only these days, but I have been using them since the mid 1960’s.

    Which ever equipment works best for you, the cost in training and proper low light quality practice will cost much more than $200.

    Good luck.

    Fred

    Semper Fi

    1. Thank you for your thoughts, Sir! Your experiences are invaluable for the rest of us to learn from. Thanks for taking the time to respond and for your service! And I totally agree that the training ultimately will be the big money pit (but the critical one).
      Cheers!

Leave a Reply to Mark L Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *